INTRODUCTION
In the intellectual property domain, it is very significant to register your trademark. Any word, phrase, symbol, design, goods, or services, or a combination of these, that distinguishes yours from those of others can be considered a trademark. The absolute grounds for refusing a trademark registration are outlined in Section 9(2) of the Trade Mark Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). These grounds are distinctive characteristics of any prior or existing trademarks and focus on the mark's unique qualities. A mark will not be eligible for registration under Indian law if it does not comply with the requirements outlined in Section 9 (2). Below is a thorough explanation of every clause.
ELUCIDATE SECTION 9 (2) OF THE ACT
Section 9(2)(a) of the Trademark Act, 1999, provides that a trademark cannot be registered if it is misleading or deceptive to the public or causes confusion with marks that are already registered. This applies primarily to safeguarding consumers and preventing misunderstandings about the origins of the goods or services in the marketplace.
Section 9(2)(b) of the Trademark Act, 1999, provides that a trademark that might offend religious sensibilities or any particular class or group of people, their caste, religion, or ethnicity will not be registered.
In support of the above-mentioned submissions, we put judgment to exemplify,
In the case of Om Logistics Limited V. Sh. Mahendra Pandey (CS(Comm) 447/2021), the Delhi High Court held that the word 'OM' is a religious symbol, and in India, it is a common practice that names of gods and goddesses and religious symbols are used as names of individuals as well as business entities.
Therefore, OML cannot be allowed to monopolize the use of the religious symbol 'OM' in this regard as per section 9(2)(b) of the Trademarks Act, 1999.
Section 9(2)(c) of the Trademark Act of 1999 provides that a trademark will be rejected if it includes or contains pornographic, scandalous, or vulgar content. This same law also forbids the use of marks that might be interpreted as offensive to public morals or decency.
Section 9(2)(d) of the Trademark Act, 1999, provides that a trademark will not be registrable if it violates any of the provisions of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950, which explicitly prohibits the use of specific names or emblems.
CONCLUSION
People have been extremely cautious when it comes to the protection of their property. The purpose of a trademark is to ensure that the audience is able to identify the source of a product. Under this section various absolute grounds for refusal are given, such as being likely to deceive the public or cause confusion with existing marks, matter too likely to hurt religious susceptibilities, inappropriate content, scandalous or vulgar content, and words prohibited under the Emblems and Names Act.
India: +91-1141 8355 50