anovIP Asia Insights → Trademark - Reference Guide+ Fee Schedule (MALAYSI...

Trademark - Reference Guide+ Fee Schedule (MALAYSIA)

Trademark - Reference Guide+ Fee Schedule (MALAYSIA)

Filing Requirements in Malaysia

Softcopy of the trademark artwork (JPEG or PDF format) in high resolution

Full name & address of the applicant

If the applicant is a company, please provide a copy of the company's Certificate of Incorporation and state the name of authorized signatory on behalf of the company for the trademark filing documents

List of goods and services in relation to the proposed trademark

Class number (Nice Classification)

Priority information, if priority right is being claimed

Translation of the trademark if it consists of non-English or national language of Malaysia (Bahasa Melayu).

  

Other Requirements

Languages: English or Malay (Bahasa Maleyu). In case Foreign language (Text/Symbols/Icons must be submitted with their English translation.)

Multiple Class Applications: Multiple class trademark applications are allowed in Malaysia

Power of Attorney: Simply executed Power of Attorney to be submitted simultaneously with the application

Priority Document: Certified copy of the Priority Document within onemonths from the date of filing of convention application in Malaysia along with a certifiedEnglish translation (if required).

Validity Term: 10 years from the filing date, renewable indefinitely for successive 10-year periods.

Official Examination/ issuance of Office Action: After an application is filed, it is examined by the MyIPO in two stages i.e. formal and substantive examination to ensure it meets the requirements of the Trademarks Act 2019 with regard to the distinctiveness, possibility of deceptiveness and conflicting trademarks. The MYIPO registry may accept, reject, or request amendments. The applicant is informed of any objections raised by the registrar via Examination Report and has two (2) months to reply to Examination report or request a hearing.The application is abandoned if no response is received.

Publication and Opposition: The trademark application can be opposed by any person within two months of its publication (advertisement) in Trademarks Journal.

Renewal: Request can be submitted via Form TMR/ Form12. There is a grace period of 12 months for late renewal upon payment of additional fees. Restoration request can be filed within six months from the expiration date with additional fees.

Non-Use Cancellation: A trademark may be cancelled if it has not been used fora continuous period of three years from the date of registration


REFERENCE GUIDE TRADEMARKS - THE PROCESS

STEP 1Search for Similar Existing Marks- Though it is not a compulsory step, however this step is recommended to confirm that the applied mark is unique and available. It is done through the official website -https://www.myipo.gov.my/underFORM TM A1.

STEP 2 –Filing - Submit a trademark application under FORM TM A2 along with details such as a clear representation of the trademark, a list of the goods and/or services for which the trademark will be used, a priority document (if claiming priority from a previous filing) and the requisite fee.

STEP 3 - Request for Examination- After the application for the applied trademark is filed it is examined by the Examiner for Formality Examination and Substantive Examination. Accordingly, Examination Report is issued.

STEP 4 -Response to Examination -The applicant must address the objections and submit a response, providing justifications or making amendments as necessary.

STEP 5- Advertisement - If response is accepted by the examiner, the mark is accepted and published in the Journal by MYIPO to allow third parties to oppose the registration. The opposition period lasts for two months from the date of publication.

STEP 6: Opposition (if any)- If there is no opposition, the trademark proceeds towards registration. If an opposition is filed, both parties (the applicant and the opponent) present their cases, and the Registrar of trademarks makes a decision.

STEP 7: Registration - If no opposition is filed or if the opposition is resolved in favor of the applicant, the trademark is registered, and a certificate of registration is issued.

STEP 8Renewal -Trademarks in India are valid for ten years from the date of application and can be renewed further periods of ten years upon each request.


FEE SCHEDULE (MALAYSIA)

PARTICULARS OFFICIAL FEE (USD) PROFESSIONAL FEE
1.SEARCH
Trademark Search with report & professional opinion N/A 250
2.FILING OF TRADEMARK APPLICATION UP TO PUBLICATION & ISSUANCE OF REGISTRATION NOTICE
For standard items 237 288
For Non-standard items 273 288
3.EXAMINATION
Request for expedited examination of a trademark application 244 (for each class) 256
4.CLAIMING PRIORITY N/A 100
5.OFFICE ACTIONS
(A) Responding to Refusal (written appeal) N/A 870 (per class)
(B) Responding to Refusal with Attending Hearing 37 (per class) 1133 (per class)
6. Opposition
Notice of Opposition 244 (for each class) 1004 (per class)
Counter Statement 85 (for each class) 1004 (per class)
Filing Statutory Declaration in Support of Opposition N/A 1004 (per class)
Final Submission & Conclusion including Hearing N/A 1120 (per class)
7. Annuity (Renewals)
Within due date 244 (per class) 294
Late renewal 293 (per class) 300
Request for restoration-If applying for re-entry of the issued registration within six months from the date of removal 366 (per class) 300


Conclusion

Trademark registration in Malaysia, administered by the Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (MyIPO), provides a robust and well-structured framework for brand protection. With a validity term of 10 years from the filing date and indefinitely renewable protection, a registered trademark in Malaysia is a valuable long-term commercial asset for both domestic and international businesses.

Malaysia's trademark regime carries several distinguishing features worth noting: multiple-class applications are permitted under a single filing, enabling cost-effective portfolio management; the non-use cancellation threshold is three years — one of the shorter windows in the region — underscoring the importance of actively using your mark post-registration; and the 12-month grace period for renewal, with a further six-month restoration window, provides considerable flexibility in managing renewal timelines. Applicants must respond to examination reports within two months to avoid abandonment of their application.

Whether filing as a domestic business or a foreign entity, strict adherence to MyIPO's procedural timelines and documentation requirements is critical to protecting your brand in this market. Engaging qualified trademark counsel ensures a smooth path from initial filing through examination, publication, opposition, and registration — and provides the ongoing portfolio oversight needed to keep your Malaysian trademark rights secure for the long term.

STAY UPDATED WITH anovIP

Subscribe for Our Latest Insights

anovIP Asia


Patents – Reference Guide + Fee Schedule (Thailand)

This guide provides a comprehensive overview of patent protection in Thailand, covering PCT national phase entry, conventional priority applications, petty patents, filing requirements, examination procedures, publication timelines, patent validity, renewal obligations, and official fee schedules. It serves as a practical resource for inventors, businesses, and IP professionals seeking patent protection and maintenance in Thailand.

Patents – Reference Guide + Fee Schedule (Sri Lanka)

This guide provides a comprehensive overview of patent protection in Sri Lanka, covering PCT national phase entry, conventional priority applications, filing requirements, examination procedures, publication timelines, patent validity, renewal obligations, and official fee schedules. It serves as a practical resource for inventors, businesses, and IP professionals seeking patent protection and maintenance in Sri Lanka.

Patents – Reference Guide + Fee Schedule (Philippines)

This comprehensive guide explains the patent filing process in the Philippines, including PCT national phase entry, conventional priority applications, utility models, examination requirements, publication timelines, patent validity, annual maintenance fees, and official fee schedules. It serves as a practical reference for inventors, businesses, and IP professionals seeking patent protection in the Philippines.

Patents – Reference Guide + Fee Schedule (Pakistan)

This guide provides a comprehensive overview of patent protection in Pakistan, covering conventional priority filings, documentation requirements, examination procedures, publication timelines, patent validity, renewal obligations, and official fee schedules. It serves as a practical resource for inventors, businesses, and IP professionals seeking patent protection and maintenance in Pakistan.

Patents – Reference Guide + Fee Schedule (Nepal)

This reference guide provides a complete overview of patent protection in Nepal, including convention priority filings, documentation requirements, examination procedures, patent validity, renewal rules, and official fee schedules. It serves as a practical resource for inventors, businesses, and IP professionals seeking to secure and maintain patent rights in Nepal.

Patents – Reference Guide + Fee Schedule (Malaysia)

Malaysia offers comprehensive patent protection through standard patents, PCT national phase applications, convention filings, and Utility Innovation (UI) patents. Applicants must comply with filing requirements, examination procedures, priority deadlines, and annual maintenance obligations. This guide provides an overview of patent requirements, prosecution procedures, examination routes, validity periods, and official fee schedules, helping inventors and businesses effectively secure and maintain patent rights in Malaysia.

Your Strategic IP Partner in Asia and Beyond

At anovIP Asia, we don't just understand intellectual property; we strategize its power. From mitigating risks in joint ventures and securing trademarks in new markets, to maximizing the value of your patent portfolio, our expertise spans the full IP lifecycle. We are your dedicated counsel for navigating the complexities of IP in Southeast Asia and across the globe.

anovIP Analytics


What If Your EV Battery Never Needed a Charger Again?

This article explores how solar paint batteries could revolutionize electric vehicles by transforming painted surfaces into energy-generating systems. It explains the science behind photovoltaic coatings, nano-materials, and self-charging EVs while highlighting benefits such as reduced charging dependence, improved energy efficiency, and lower range anxiety. The article also examines emerging patent opportunities in solar coatings, AI-powered energy optimization, and battery integration, along with how anovIP helps innovators protect and commercialize next-generation clean mobility technologies.

Recycling of Wind Turbine Blades

This article explores the growing need for wind turbine blade recycling as renewable energy installations reach the end of their lifecycle. It covers recycling challenges, advanced technologies such as mechanical, thermal, and chemical recycling, environmental and economic benefits, industry case studies, and future innovations. The article also highlights emerging patent opportunities and explains how anovIP supports organizations through patent strategy, technology scouting, market intelligence, commercialization, and intellectual property protection in the circular economy.

Generative AI in Software-Defined Vehicles

This article explores how Generative AI is transforming Software-Defined Vehicles (SDVs) into intelligent, adaptive, and continuously evolving mobility platforms. It highlights key innovations such as context-aware decision-making, natural language interaction, digital twins, AI-generated OTA updates, and predictive intelligence. The article also examines emerging patent opportunities and explains how anovIP helps organizations protect AI-driven automotive innovations through patent strategy, landscape analysis, freedom-to-operate assessments, and global intellectual property management.

FMCW LiDAR in Smart Cities: Infrastructure Monitoring and Digital Twins

This article explores how FMCW LiDAR is revolutionizing smart cities through accurate infrastructure monitoring and real-time digital twin technology. It explains the technology, its benefits, applications in structural health monitoring, and market opportunities. The article also highlights the importance of intellectual property protection and demonstrates how anovIP helps innovators with patent strategy, freedom-to-operate analysis, patent landscaping, and commercialization of next-generation LiDAR technologies.

The Evolution of Mixed Reality: Innovations, Applications, and Emerging Trends

Mixed Reality (MR) is revolutionizing digital interaction by seamlessly blending physical and virtual environments through spatial computing, artificial intelligence, and advanced wearable devices. This article explores the evolution of MR technology, key innovations in hardware and software, real-world applications across healthcare, education, manufacturing, and entertainment, as well as emerging trends such as AI-powered smart glasses, digital twins, cloud-based collaboration, and 5G-enabled immersive experiences. As adoption accelerates worldwide, Mixed Reality is set to become a cornerstone of future work, learning, and everyday digital experiences.

WI-FI 8: POWERING THE FUTURE OF ULTRA-FAST, LIMITLESS CONNECTIVITY

Wi-Fi 8 (IEEE 802.11bn) is the next evolution of wireless networking, designed to deliver highly reliable, low-latency, and seamless connectivity rather than simply increasing speed. Through innovations such as Multi-AP Coordination, smarter power management, advanced spectrum utilization, enhanced roaming, and improved Quality of Service (QoS), Wi-Fi 8 aims to support emerging technologies including IoT, smart homes, extended reality (XR), industrial automation, healthcare, and high-density enterprise environments. As digital ecosystems continue to expand, Wi-Fi 8 is poised to become a foundational technology for the connected future.

Streamline Your IP Operations with Expert Paralegal Support

anovIP Paralegal delivers exceptional outsourced paralegal services, helping IP law firms, corporate legal departments, and patent practitioners master their non-technical IP tasks. We drive down operational costs and elevate workflow efficiency without sacrificing quality.

anovIP Paralegal


Assignments And Transmissions

Learn the critical differences between trademark assignment and transmission to effectively manage and transfer your valuable brand assets.

Registered User Not to Have Right of Assignment or Transmission

Learn the vital legal distinctions between a trademark owner and a registered user regarding the rights of assignment and transmission.

International Registration Under Madrid Protocol – A Comprehensive Study

Discover the strategic advantages of the Madrid System for securing and managing your trademarks across multiple international jurisdictions.

Unlock R&D Potential with Strategic IP

At anovIP R&D Support, we champion research and development as the engine of transformative innovation. Our specialized division provides research-backed insights and strategic IP planning designed to help businesses, academic institutions, and startups amplify their R&D outcomes and achieve market success.

anovIP Advisors


What NVIDIA’s Recent Patent Portfolio Reveals About Its Full-Stack Innovation Strategy

Discover the strategic IP blueprint behind NVIDIA's dominance by analyzing its recent patents across the entire AI and graphics stack.

Netflix's Section 101 Strategy: How Netflix Engineers System-Level Patent Defensibility

Learn how Netflix builds a litigation-ready patent portfolio by focusing on technical systems to overcome post-Alice Section 101 challenges.

What a Review of Netflix's Recently Published Patents Reveals

Beyond its content library, Netflix's patent filings expose a deliberate technology-first strategy. Learn what their IP reveals about their future.

How Google’s Patent Portfolio Secures Section 101-Eligibility by Patenting Ambient Intelligence Syst

Uncover the strategic framework Google uses to secure AI patent eligibility, focusing on integrated systems over abstract algorithmic concepts.

What Google’s Recent Patent Portfolio Reveals About Its Platform-First Innovation Strategy

Discover the strategic patterns in Google's recent patents, revealing how they build a cohesive, platform-first intelligent ecosystem.

Gilead’s Patent Portfolio as a Map of Future Blockbusters

Discover how Gilead's 'anchor patent' strategy provides a blueprint for its next generation of blockbuster drugs and market dominance.

Unlock IP Success in the Indian Market with anovIP India

At anovIP India, we provide specialized IP counsel tailored for the dynamic Indian landscape. We empower startups and established businesses alike by navigating Indian IP law, developing robust trademark and patent strategies, and fostering incubator collaborations.

anovIP India


CHAPTER V - OPPOSITION PROCEEDINGS TO GRANT OF PATENTS

The Indian Patents Act, 1970 provides a robust opposition framework that allows third parties to challenge patent applications and granted patents to ensure only valid inventions receive protection. Section 25 establishes two forms of opposition—pre-grant opposition, which may be filed by any person before a patent is granted, and post-grant opposition, which can be filed by an interested person within one year of grant. These proceedings help prevent wrongful patent monopolies, encourage transparency, and safeguard public interest by scrutinizing novelty, inventive step, patentability, disclosure requirements, and compliance with statutory obligations. The opposition system plays a critical role in maintaining the integrity and quality of the Indian patent regime.

CHAPTER VI - Anticipation

Anticipation is a fundamental concept in patent law that determines whether an invention is truly novel and eligible for patent protection. Under the Indian Patents Act, 1970, an invention may be anticipated if it has been publicly disclosed, published, claimed, or used before the filing or priority date of the patent application. However, Sections 29 to 34 provide important exceptions for disclosures made without the inventor's consent, government testing, scientific exhibitions, public trials, and provisional applications. These provisions help protect genuine inventors from losing patent rights due to unavoidable or permitted disclosures while maintaining the novelty requirements of the patent system.

CHAPTER IV - PUBLICATION, AND EXAMINATION OF APPLICATION

The Indian Patents Act, 1970 establishes a structured framework for the publication and examination of patent applications to ensure only novel and inventive technologies receive patent protection. Sections 11A to 21 govern important aspects such as publication of applications, Request for Examination (RFE), prior art searches, examination reports, divisional applications, and substitution of applicants. Recent amendments have shortened examination timelines and introduced expedited procedures for eligible applicants. Understanding these provisions is essential for inventors, startups, and businesses seeking efficient patent prosecution and successful patent grants in India.

CHAPTER XII - SURRENDER AND REVOCATION OF PATENTS

The Indian Patents Act, 1970 provides comprehensive mechanisms for surrender and revocation of patents to ensure that only valid, lawful, and socially beneficial inventions enjoy patent protection. Sections 64 to 66 outline various grounds for revocation, including lack of novelty, non-patentable subject matter, wrongful obtaining, insufficient disclosure, non-working of patents, and violations of secrecy provisions. The Act also permits post-grant opposition, compulsory licensing-related revocation, and government-led revocation in matters affecting public interest or national security. These provisions act as important safeguards against abuse of patent rights while maintaining a fair balance between innovation, competition, and public welfare.

CHAPTER XVI - WORKING OF PATENTS, COMPULSORY LICENCES AND REVOCATION

The Indian Patents Act, 1970 ensures that patents serve not only private interests but also the public good. Under Sections 83 to 94, patentees are expected to commercially work their inventions in India and make patented products reasonably accessible to the public. Where patented inventions are not adequately worked, are unaffordable, or fail to meet public demand, the law permits compulsory licensing. The Act also empowers the Controller to modify, terminate, or revoke patent rights in certain circumstances while balancing the interests of inventors, businesses, and society. These provisions are particularly significant in sectors such as pharmaceuticals, healthcare, and essential technologies, where public access is a key policy objective.

Chapter XVIII - Suits Concerning Infringement of Patent

Patent rights are meaningful only when they can be effectively enforced. The Indian Patents Act, 1970 provides a comprehensive legal framework for patent infringement actions, enabling patentees, exclusive licensees, and compulsory licensees to protect their inventions against unauthorized use. The Act outlines the jurisdiction of courts, available remedies such as injunctions, damages, and account of profits, as well as procedural safeguards including burden of proof provisions for process patents. It also recognizes important exceptions such as the Bolar exemption, parallel imports, good-faith infringement, and declaratory actions for non-infringement. Through judicial precedents and statutory protections, the Act balances the rights of patent owners with the interests of businesses, innovators, and the public.

Transform University Research into Real-World Impact

At anovIP Universities, we specialize in forging the crucial link between academic innovation and industry application. Our dedicated division empowers universities to maximize the societal and economic impact of their research through strategic IP commercialization, IP education tailored for academics, and collaborative joint patent development.

Ready to take the next step? Contact us.

anovIP Abstract Design
anovIP Asia anovIP Analytics anovIP Paralegal anovIP India anovIP Universities anovIP AI anovIP Advisors anovIP Foundation anovIP Asia anovIP Analytics anovIP Paralegal anovIP India anovIP Universities anovIP AI anovIP Advisors anovIP Foundation anovIP Asia anovIP Analytics anovIP Paralegal anovIP India anovIP Universities anovIP AI anovIP Advisors anovIP Foundation anovIP Asia anovIP Analytics anovIP Paralegal anovIP India anovIP Universities anovIP AI anovIP Advisors anovIP Foundation anovIP Asia anovIP Analytics anovIP Paralegal anovIP India anovIP Universities anovIP AI anovIP Advisors anovIP Foundation anovIP Asia anovIP Analytics anovIP Paralegal anovIP India anovIP Universities anovIP AI anovIP Advisors anovIP Foundation anovIP Asia anovIP Analytics anovIP Paralegal anovIP India anovIP Universities anovIP AI anovIP Advisors anovIP Foundation anovIP Asia anovIP Analytics anovIP Paralegal anovIP India anovIP Universities anovIP AI anovIP Advisors anovIP Foundation anovIP Asia anovIP Analytics anovIP Paralegal anovIP India anovIP Universities anovIP AI anovIP Advisors anovIP Foundation